What is the message you choose?


The presentation by Barbara Smith Logan on Minding messages, mindsets, & motives: A pathway to efficacious leadership is the presentation that ties the program together. “Messages, according to Smith Logan, are those positive and negative mental messages that are repeated to us day after day, year after year and decade after decade.” One has the ability to embrace those messages, good or bad, and either to use them to thrive or die. Smith Logan’s message of “efficacy is the power to produce the desired effect.  It is your power or your capacity to produce the desired effect” (Smith Logan, 2017) is profoundly poignant and applicable. While in the Doc. Program we can choose to believe those things that limit us or those that foster our abilities. If only it were so easy make that choice – believe some and not others.
            If an organization is dysfunctional and its leaders have traits such as authoritarianism, are craving power and/or are pushing forth a personal agenda there is little room to develop strong messages and support. Within the context of the Institutes of Higher Education (IHE) structure organizational dysfunction seems to be a norm rather than an exception. This, I believe, is due to the fact that even though we operate under a business model we are not producing widgets. The goal of HE is the edification of people. Which, in and of it self, is measurable via testing, accreditation, job placement, etc. but it is not palpable. The Seven Phases of Planned Change model posited by Lippit, Watson and Westly seems to best reflect the process that IHE tend to follow when trying to foster change. The difficulty with Lippit, Watson and Westly it is only effective and/or successful when implementing low level and less effective changes. Rather than trying to see change as dynamic it is static; only addressing the current issues rather than demonstrating a view that is long term, forward thinking and expansive.
            Dr. Alexander Durant and Mr. Amanuel Teklu, from the International Institute of Wisconsin, alluded to this type of change within the context of the refugee system in Wisconsin and throughout the world. Although there is a systemic need for a restructuring of the process refuges management there is no movement within world leadership to address the need. One of the issues is that “we must continually educate ourselves because we don’t know from where the next group is coming from” (Durtka, 2017). This global connectedness is too much for the majority of Americans. Although, The World is Flat according to Thomas Friedman, in an age of instant posts, tweets and snaps, we are disconnected. In an age of instant posts, tweets and snaps, there is little that binds us together sans the desire by the few to create a world that functional leadership reigns, recognizes when it needs to create change and reinforces the development of new leaders.

Young children at UNHCR camp Minaloc, Rwanda (2007)
UNHCR camp Minaloc, Rwanda (2007)



Comments

Popular Posts